$15M wiped on a deal that actually worked


Hey Reader,

You may have seen the Brandon Turner news last week.

He is a big name in real estate. His team bought an apartment building in Texas a few years ago for $72 million. The deal worked. Rents went up 33%. The building stayed full. By every measure, the operator did what he said he would do.

Then the market shifted, and they had to sell for $62 million.

Here is what happened to everyone's money:

Same building. Same operator. Same deal. Three completely different outcomes.

The difference was where each investor was sitting.

When you invest in something backed by real estate, you are either an owner or a lender. Owners hope the value goes up and they get paid last when things sell. Lenders make a loan against the property and get paid first.

That is not bad luck. That is just how the line works.

This is not a Brandon Turner problem. He has been transparent about what happened, and the deal performed operationally. He is not the lesson.

This is also not an argument against equity deals. Plenty of investors take that position knowingly and do well with it.

The lesson is just this. Before you put money into anything backed by real estate, the most important question is not "what is the projected return?" It is "where am I sitting in this deal?"

If you cannot answer that in one sentence, the rest of the math does not matter.

I think about this a lot because of the position I hold in my own deals. When I buy a mortgage note, the borrower pays me, and the property secures the loan. It is not the only way to invest in real estate, but it is the way that fits how I think about risk.

I wrote a longer letter walking through exactly how I think about this. It covers the six questions I work through before committing capital to any real estate-backed deal, plus the page most people end up screenshotting — how I evaluate the operator.

If you find your answer and are not sure what to do with it, hit reply. I read every response.

Sierra

Check out all episodes!

Educational content only. Personal investment examples are shared for illustration and do not constitute investment, tax, legal, or financial advice, or an offer to sell securities.

600 1st Ave, Ste 330 PMB 92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2246
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Wealth With Notes Newsletter

Discover How Smart Investors Earn 10-15% Returns from Real Estate Without Being Landlords

Read more from Wealth With Notes Newsletter

Hey Reader, Every 18 months, real estate has a new "hot" strategy. Short-term Rentals Wholesaling BRRRR RV Parks Sober living homes Each one got hyped, pulled in a wave of investors, then cooled the moment the conditions that made it special shifted. Mortgage notes have never been on that list. Not because they're boring (they are), but because they don't depend on the conditions that make trends work. A short-term rental needs tourism, friendly ordinances, low rates, and the right platform...

Hey Reader, If you're someone who's heard how the wealthy borrow against their assets instead of selling them, you already understand the idea behind this. The rich rarely sell what's working. They borrow against it. Buy an asset, borrow against it, keep it growing, that's the playbook some people call "buy, borrow, die." The asset stays theirs while the borrowed money goes to work somewhere else. You can do the same thing with a note. It has an intimidating name: Hypothecation It's simpler...

Hey Reader, If you're someone who likes knowing how the work actually gets done before you trust it, this one's for you. People assume AI in investing means a bot picking trades. That's not how I use it. I use it for the data analysis & underwriting, the work that takes up most of my time. Because here's the truth, I want everyone to know Note investing is more passive than being a landlord, but it is not truly passive. So here is the process for me these days. It usually starts with a loan...