This is the wrong way to do seller financing


Hey Reader,

Last week, the City of St. Louis filed a lawsuit against a real estate investor over a strategy called the “slow flip.”

The idea sounds simple.

Buy inexpensive homes.

Sell them to buyers using a contract for deed (Check out an article I wrote about this).

Let the buyer make monthly payments toward ownership.

In theory, this can create a path to homeownership for people who may not qualify for a traditional mortgage.

But according to the lawsuit, there was a major problem.

The City alleges buyers were placed into distressed properties, required to handle repairs, and could lose the home if they fell behind on payments or failed to maintain the property.

And depending on the contract, they could also lose the money they had already paid and the improvements they had made.

That’s the wrong way to do this business.

Not because seller financing is bad.

Not because contracts for deed are automatically bad.

The problem is the incentive.

If you're creating a pathway to homeownership, your deal should be structured for the buyer to actually become the homeowner.

That means:

✔️ A property they can safely live in
✔️ A payment they can realistically afford
✔️ Clear terms they understand
✔️ Proper underwriting before the deal is made
✔️ A realistic path to getting the deed

Creative financing can solve a real problem.

There are people who can afford a home but don't fit neatly into a bank's lending box.

Self-employed borrowers.

People rebuilding their credit.

Families without perfect financial histories.

Seller financing can give those people another path.

But here's the test I think every investor should use:

What has to happen for you to win?

If you win when the buyer makes their payments, takes care of the property, and eventually owns the home, your incentives are aligned.

If your business works even better when buyers repeatedly default, and you can sell the same property again, something is wrong with the model.

Good creative finance should create two winners.

The investor gets a performing note and dependable cash flow.

The buyer gets a real path to ownership.

The goal isn't to see how many times you can sell the same house.

The goal is for the person buying it to eventually own it.

video preview

If this story has you wondering what responsible note investing actually looks like, that’s the next thing to understand.

I created a free guide that breaks down how notes work, where they come from, and how investors make money from them.

Check out the guide below 👇🏽

Sierra

Educational content only. Personal investment examples are shared for illustration and do not constitute investment, tax, legal, or financial advice, or an offer to sell securities.

600 1st Ave, Ste 330 PMB 92768, Seattle, WA 98104-2246
Unsubscribe · Preferences

Wealth With Notes Newsletter

Discover How Smart Investors Earn 10-15% Returns from Real Estate Without Being Landlords

Read more from Wealth With Notes Newsletter

Hey Reader, Better Mortgage and Coinbase just made their token-backed mortgage program broadly available. The headline is obviously going to be: “Use Bitcoin to buy a house.” But as a note investor, that is not the part I find most interesting. I’m looking at the debt structure. Here’s what they built. The borrower gets a traditional conforming first mortgage. Then there is a second loan used to fund the down payment. That second loan is secured by the borrower’s pledged Bitcoin and a second...

Hey Reader! If a mortgage note deal landed in your inbox tomorrow, would you know what to do with it? That is what we are working on inside the 3 Day Note Investor Challenge. A few people received the early VIP offer. Now registration is officially open to everyone. From August 5- 7th, you will: Day 1: Build your note investing strategy and buy boxDay 2: Analyze a real mortgage note dealDay 3: Decide whether to buy, pass, or ask for more information, then build your 90-day action plan The...

Hey Reader, When I look at a seller financed note, there is one question that matters more to me than almost any other. How was the borrower qualified for this loan? The reason I focus on it is because every other number on a listing is a snapshot. The property value. The interest rate. The LTV. The payment history. All useful. None of them tells me whether the borrower could actually afford the loan when they took it out. The qualification process does. A note where the borrower put $500...